As a matter of fact, we don't show what decision led to the windfall, we just show that they have a balance. This way we are fully adhearing to campaign finance laws, bribery statutes and the like. Our intention is not to further corrupt politics the way lobyists do, it's to re-incentivise politicians to do what they told the public in their campaign platform.
Lobbyists pay polititians during their campaign in the form of donations to influence politics, we pay after the lawmakers do what they promised their constituents during their campaign.
You be the judge on which method more closely resembles bribery and fosters corruption.